delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 19 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2534
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-10-19T05:31:08.585749+00:00- previous_
hash 2605447376936d5bc404c68dacd271228986631ece2098464dc4c562cbe7d348- payload_
hash 15fab9febca47e993e984a893537806940cf76c197ca19ba18001ded7ac7d448- entry_
hash 05023f41de5288eed30701a54f22d1c31ee59a531147626ff5f5c696a6a25e1d
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2534
- tree_
size - 2551
- leaf_
hash c9f37f36ca2f6711fafdb04ddb577bb8e01820f64d633952b74c09d454347666- audit_
path (10) 0: f32b3712642f2cc0d37cf2c643cb75cb79e41531685d3a05337f7953f3aaefcb1: 3e845ee847f3191ff6a7b866348970d55aa9c49fd6fc3eda61aa33ef17a033f02: 7ab1dc84829633e8a5c221ba835b0c6043d9c1f72e6c0cf20bfd6caa42493c563: 2c7cef4fe33ffe9d5d0ea75e53b25858bfe102dd44c55c85b18cc10561fed1ec4: 8306c19e915a3e01948627e291914901b20fb0b3e2da1acd35881d3a543110345: 0c9f39be840de67ce881e3215d66642e798d0eeeefcacdf578897a4aefb24ec86: 6814a7dbc4dc1e1a4a68cdcb4e6c82c2d32e5e7970f55d965d8c0e7dbb38fe3a7: 66985ebeb38bdc8b6c7298a8d4b4124a0b66d0e4786aedf5a07e19ffd2e445c28: 765303d6f29939e50694ecde6538ee53e894bb299166d5a65c9a000adbb546d99: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash db221e002ae7125dc7fe74a2d447ce33e565eb601a3e51d1b84b0a75cce9df05
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2539
- signed at
- 19 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash a725a4fc38f9ab511b484535b065f2f1d402485b98d909de2b2560ef782dde90- signature
zONwgH1p8h+yVy9o/8GZ22x+bW4cJyz1U9aoYFcK+nlNRj7FvzhmNV7VTGEI6a3FIbZ+2sOKeK9VNnIJDVIpDQ==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 10