delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 12 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2454
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-10-12T05:30:41.613927+00:00- previous_
hash 5fac51ddfaec6b1634162156d73de95f50dae1238ab336753461f6f3f54030b1- payload_
hash 1781cdd6364419aab86223a3603567001c8d78d60e7433fb28c22b23bc22511d- entry_
hash 833253349f678965c19150ad2c7f5345fd9bbfe5968983928973ba75c5165678
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2454
- tree_
size - 2491
- leaf_
hash e1e7d40dae7b3208f3bf7fd59c55537c201761edd08ab9cc0f9360ebd812c067- audit_
path (9) 0: b3e585f6b139258ce05bdcd21ab33d79910950f2b36a36307bcc022c5bf017031: 510dffc119f8a6f91f52206c3da8ed3d1d6fe4e69c3df569dc81c8e1e0b682632: 8fc137260f6354a406d2ca21fc681181c9b79e6fdd3c2b18f2e1d8b3c3b35ced3: c7a545057c20e65066493a1ff0c5d78393b248143d9b8bd71acc46da1b35d2704: 1bc26d1d1b7f97dd1b092d95ea4ed59b9799cb642b4f2a88e5c33bb65c5823115: 22694dc212d7142872cdca708e24d9fb5890e58239d6cdf7f769d5eeb5a4f79b6: 66985ebeb38bdc8b6c7298a8d4b4124a0b66d0e4786aedf5a07e19ffd2e445c27: 765303d6f29939e50694ecde6538ee53e894bb299166d5a65c9a000adbb546d98: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash a9a1dac66ff7c8ec3d4b27b434ff70fbde5df3ef3dcd4b4fe4b41bb80f78a7c7
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2455
- signed at
- 12 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash 39bb9b14e8239b0ad89a7d12f62f06de0bc85c89a14c64be9e8f0c7be91c702a- signature
hOwlmKwjsUKAFvp9V6k4r+C/ClMmMW8wxGnF1gg4Bvy5SoUnNMfHT82xTpjLu8OhEG/3+LE5YO7byrN1iPJvBw==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 9