delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 10 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2427
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-10-10T05:30:41.325421+00:00- previous_
hash 8b082a41e441732863cce4103e92fb361afc7ad948c0f101d4eeb0ac4a134621- payload_
hash 3b36fadc028b47b379cb85e814a964a1a059eef6dd2f051d311f6ba9c924b299- entry_
hash 38992bc60df8ae9718cca2d5c7f8bfe9c8b4845f7a1ef3ab3dc354277609e8fc
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2427
- tree_
size - 2479
- leaf_
hash 0c47d8731e1f1009ad6141cc5658f5042a3735bff3c12333376332978d4bd411- audit_
path (10) 0: cb3c2cedf628fde5ecdbce83a24a5548d824707336e5a07e9c08d0b6d3cb964f1: 645415c1b4b669ec41a4fdcb2936f51669347e0aa787f36df406b304051d68922: c2934b7c88a50b107ad821212647da851baabfd92095856be0a14a095d7b60e33: c74d3d6f2fedf18f7e6f392182cb3607f8a451b8985398bd517e714de87109fb4: e709eed227859a2921b3fe6029040da8a269e8e4ab9cdb33dfd380e7f97129435: 2ed9cc8d273cab38fad19f47bbc010224a19439490ee53913441e305b38d15b36: 834c6985c52ea8f25de55920638ea90cbddfd15c7f0b1819c969144787359e5b7: 99ee92a7962953bad0227dbe9ab05c66de08e3b0b7eb51768dee6e3fc62b3b558: 765303d6f29939e50694ecde6538ee53e894bb299166d5a65c9a000adbb546d99: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash 2135d33fc3b42de9408df8505e145fcd175142e943af391ea41c56bc99a1e5e2
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2431
- signed at
- 10 Oct 2026, 05:30 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash 2f561f1e5bff2ee51c0887b01ab4cfe297527d5337a2f6c7613f257fcf79128b- signature
5w1hVQc3o8WIoEDJo1bnVkPEVWSllqX22v6vJGTRHCbNiYCopwv0c3iVNmGaA4Oc+4fdRhCLUaFhghOAMKLBCQ==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 10