delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 9 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2415
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-10-09T05:31:42.055030+00:00- previous_
hash eaf8204658e700d626af1bdca26bf8592ce2eca4b3d1d1c476d3549ce887dead- payload_
hash 59d96cffbd8d9497692093954665bb3592f2891db08563a92d63374cd8430ff1- entry_
hash 90766dae058142c9dd50463d8882d0de02f0961f66f6e1f05ad6e9ebaad1ca1d
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2415
- tree_
size - 2479
- leaf_
hash 9c78e83d8939b259114b7db222beff24e1e9687361a61f074b544afd98873149- audit_
path (10) 0: 9a7637cc25e815f9ba777f7f767e2765d22d11a42dd70ee08024f688737b43161: bb81ce1c1701b26850ae8822b27d71d4e0da28c0139dbba39821905e0d90d3eb2: ee5997b7f60291f66a5adbb25d2ed8c7677b18ff3cb9896620758184752a46613: 164e8c911f6d97e3e8ac86735d036e21d558dc66a27d9093870fa15919d537534: db274f2c2d258d8ad51d20c9f769f86b1f49716e419ca700f25edc4da1c8d5875: 2ed9cc8d273cab38fad19f47bbc010224a19439490ee53913441e305b38d15b36: 834c6985c52ea8f25de55920638ea90cbddfd15c7f0b1819c969144787359e5b7: 99ee92a7962953bad0227dbe9ab05c66de08e3b0b7eb51768dee6e3fc62b3b558: 765303d6f29939e50694ecde6538ee53e894bb299166d5a65c9a000adbb546d99: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash 2135d33fc3b42de9408df8505e145fcd175142e943af391ea41c56bc99a1e5e2
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2419
- signed at
- 9 Oct 2026, 05:31 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash 792ab27f6aac6b3114b00e2bfd761c3c231f1eebb3e41b8d60921762149749ed- signature
P8JWfRWThdlhpGIU+LW8ooR/v/GHZYyB/est+Aigxj+KOIE0Kk1uvkXB2Qs98jbrN6ziBcpn+VJ7dCZTSbIEAA==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 10